We’ve now learned two powerful syntaxes for creating sequences: list comprehensions (Post #120), which build a full list in memory, and generator expressions (Post #127), which create a “lazy” generator object. We know that generators are the clear winner for memory usage, especially with large datasets.
But what about speed? Is one always faster than the other? And which one should you choose for your specific problem?
In this post, we’ll put them head-to-head in a performance showdown. We’ll look at the trade-offs between the speed of list comprehensions and the memory efficiency of generators to help you decide which to use.
The Contenders: Eager vs. Lazy
Let’s quickly recap our two competitors:
- List Comprehension (
[]): The “Eager Competitor.” It does all the work upfront, calculating every value and storing it in a list in memory before you can use it. - Generator Expression (
()): The “Lazy Competitor.” It does almost no work upfront. It creates a small object that knows how to produce the values, but only generates them one-by-one when asked.
Round 1: Memory Usage (The Clear Winner)
Let’s start with the easiest round. As we demonstrated in Post #126, the difference in memory consumption is staggering for large sequences.
A list comprehension [i for i in range(1_000_000)] will consume many megabytes of RAM.
A generator expression (i for i in range(1_000_000)) will consume only a tiny, constant amount of memory, regardless of the size of the range.
Verdict: For large or potentially infinite sequences, the generator expression is the undisputed champion of memory efficiency.
Round 2: Execution Speed (It’s Complicated)
When it comes to speed, the answer is more nuanced and depends on how you plan to use the result.
Scenario A: Full Iteration
If your goal is to create a sequence and then iterate over it completely (for example, summing all the values), the list comprehension is often slightly faster overall.
Why? List comprehensions are highly optimized operations in Python. They can allocate a large block of memory and fill it very quickly. The “pause and resume” nature of generators (the yield mechanism from Post #128) introduces a small function-call overhead for each and every item, which can add up over millions of iterations.
Scenario B: “Time to First Item” or Early Exit
If you only need the first few items from a very long sequence, or if your loop might exit early with a break statement, the generator expression is the clear winner for speed.
A list comprehension has to build the entire list before you can access even the first item. This can cause a long initial delay. A generator expression produces the first item almost instantly because it doesn’t need to compute the rest of the sequence.
The Final Verdict: When to Use Each
Here are some clear guidelines to help you choose the right tool.
Use a List Comprehension [...] when:
- The resulting list will be a reasonable size and can easily fit in memory.
- You need to iterate over the data more than once. (Remember, generators are single-use!).
- You need to use list-specific methods like
.sort()or.reverse(), or access items by index (my_list[5]).
Use a Generator Expression (...) when:
- You are working with a very large or potentially infinite dataset.
- You only need to iterate over the data a single time.
- Memory efficiency is your primary concern.
- You are building a data processing pipeline where you want to handle items one at a time (e.g., passing the generator directly into another function like
sum()).
What’s Next?
The choice between a list comprehension and a generator expression is a classic trade-off. List comprehensions are often faster if the data is pre-computed and fits in memory, while generator expressions are essential for memory-light processing because they compute on demand. Choose the tool that best fits the scale of your problem.
Generator expressions are a key feature of a style of programming called “functional programming.” Python has several other built-in functions that support this style. In Post #130, we will explore one of these: the map() function.
Author
Experienced Cloud & DevOps Engineer with hands-on experience in AWS, GCP, Terraform, Ansible, ELK, Docker, Git, GitLab, Python, PowerShell, Shell, and theoretical knowledge on Azure, Kubernetes & Jenkins. In my free time, I write blogs on ckdbtech.com